Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marcus Daniell vs Steven De Waard Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Daniell vs Waard analysis and find out who is favored!
Marcus Daniell vs Steven De Waard Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Daniell 1 - 0 Waard
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniell has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Waard has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniell, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Waard has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Daniell has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Waard has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Daniell has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Waard winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Daniell has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 26/ 19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 34% (W/L 12/ 23). Waard has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 41/ 42).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Daniell winning 1 times and Waard being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniell winning 2 and Waard winning 0. The last match between Daniell and Waard was at the Traralgon Challenger 2, 03-11-2014, Q2 round, Hard with Marcus Daniell getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Daniell and Waard have played a deciding set 0 times, with Daniell winning 0 times and Waard 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Daniell winning 1, and Waard 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniell has played against opponents with an average rank of while Waard has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniell has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Waard has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniell has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Waard has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
500
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
707
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
48% (144-158)
Career Total W/L
51% (66-64)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,155
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marcus Daniell | Steven De Waard |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marcus Daniell | Steven De Waard |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Marcus Daniell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Romain Jouan
Player
Marcus Daniell
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Daniell
Player
Alexis Musialek
72%
(
77 of
107)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
47%
(
50 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Somdev Devvarman
Player
Marcus Daniell
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
68%
(
26 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannik Reuter
Player
Marcus Daniell
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Marcus Daniell
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Daniell
Player
Mikhail Ledovskikh
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
69)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rogerio Dutra Da Silva
Player
Marcus Daniell
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
0%
(
0 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 7-6(9) ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Marcus Daniell
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Daniell
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Marcus Daniell
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Steven De Waard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Steven De Waard
76%
(
69 of
91)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
93)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Ruben Mccormack
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Bourchier
Player
Steven De Waard
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
8
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
39 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harry Bourchier
Player
Steven De Waard
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
6
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
8
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
James Frawley
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Steven De Waard
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Steven De Waard
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Thomas Fancutt
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Daniell Vs Waard Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Daniell are available here and Waard photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
